Speaker
Description
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic was not only a global health crisis but also a catalyst for stigmatization processes. In the BMFTR-funded “StiPEx” project, we integrate qualitative and quantitative methods to conduct a comprehensive analysis of these stigmatization processes and develop anti-stigma guidelines and toolkits for pandemic preparedness.
Methods: Through systematic reviews, we compiled existing measurement tools for assessing stigmatization related to COVID-19, infectious diseases as well as interventions in this context.
To evaluate individual experiences of stigmatization during the pandemic, we conducted interviews with various target groups: 1) healthcare workers, 2) psychotherapists, 3) the general public, and 4) patients with Long COVID. The interviews were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.
In addition, we conducted a representative population survey in three waves to assess public and internalized stigma regarding COVID-19-related topics (e.g., COVID-19 infection, Long COVID).
Results / Discussion: Based on our findings, we derive practical recommendations for action and communication aimed at policymakers and public health professionals. The goal is to shape and promote anti-stigma efforts and stigma research in the context of infectious diseases over the long term and foster pandemic preparedness.
Keywords
stigma, public health, prevention, social sciences, pandemic preparedness
| Registration ID | 202 |
|---|---|
| Professional Status of the Speaker | Professor |
| Junior Scientist Status | No, I am not a Junior Scientist. |
